Sunday, July 31, 2011

Look at The Physical Science Standard | | Show the Troop of Support

As part of the experience in grades 9-12, the physical quality science to develop an understanding of the geometry of molecules.?It reviews the standard for the grouping game geometry grade materials that are closely related to the nature of spatial thinking required to understand the sample molecules.?However, the geometry standards for pre-K-2 grades 3-5 and that useful information in the development of spatial thinking skills could be used to understand three-dimensional molecular structures.?Specific.?ally, the standard indicator for grades 3-5 focus is on strengthening.?dimensional structures from blocks.?In pre-K-2 standards, encouraging students to implement change.?subsection and use symmetry to analyze mathematical situations, skills that might be useful again to describe the molecular structures.?However, in contrast to the strong links between mathematics K-4.?mathematical and scientific concepts necessary to introduce the geometry at the same time with a scientific content that could be used.?Therefore, the coordination of simple spatial concepts emerged in the early years the school held.

The lack of connection takes two forms.?In the first case, 9-12 years of chemistry, the spatial concepts of thinking that enables the students to understand the structure of atoms and molecules are introduced well in advance of need, such as between students and not?Teachers can recall the relevant aspects of the early grades.?Secondly, that the Earth and space science standard, rather than the discussion on coordination geometry, the committee could not find anything in the math standards that support the complex process of spatial thinking to describe fluid motion (wind?and ocean currents) on a rotating sphere.?It is interesting to note that the examples and clear connections of mathematics to science standards are let at the soon-sensitive education is largely gone.

Some conclusions about the coupling of the use of spatial reasoning and thinking in mathematics and science standards.?First, the close connection between mathematics (pre-K-2 and 3-5) and scientific standards (K-4) in early education.?Second, develop thinking and spatial reasoning in the early years, it is in the math standards, to help com.based computer systems support.?Thirdly, the close coupling present in the level 9-12 experience.?Specifically, follow the scientific standards to believe, but do not use clear thinking and spatial reasoning.?In addition, spatial thinking skills are presumed Sophis.ticated than being stressed in the standards in mathematics.?Fourth, higher level thinking ability to a central space for many of the key findings of science education such as situation analysis of rotating reference frames.

Finally, like all scientific standards assume a skill set very sophisticated spatial thinking, reasoning and representation, and it is difficult to know where in the educational system developed a set of skills.?To the extent that skills are taught explicitly spatial thinking, the process takes place under the heading of geometry, not just one of the ten standards that must be met by the teaching of mathematics and learning.?Therefore, there is no significant difference.?systematic treatment of spatial thinking in basic standards of education in the United States.

No related posts.

Tags: Look, Physical, Science, Standard

Source: http://www.showtroopsupport.org/education/science/look-at-the-physical-science-standard.html

james murdoch james murdoch bette midler murdoch scandal truffles truffles lil boosie

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.